Weblog
Articles
Film Reviews
Recipes
NMI Parity Check Error

Emerald Bay Photography

Resume
About
Contact

Archives for February 2005

February 21, 2005: All the President's Men - Part 1

First and foremost - we bow our heads in grief today for one of the greatest writers of our time, Hunter S. Thompson, who, in a very gonzo-like manner, decided to end his life by putting a bullet in his head yesterday.

With him, this nation has lost one of the loudest voices of political and social commentary. More so also since Thompson was feverishly dedicated to "the truth". Which is more than can be said of the rest of America's journalism community.

With the steaming pile of stories about the White House manipulating the national media growing taller day by day, one has to ask one-self what exactly the purpose of modern journalism is, or rather, what it should be.

Aren't journalists supposed to be truth-seekers? People (and their respective organizations - may they be of the broadcast or paper variety) that report on the truth to the masses?

Back in the early 70s, two reporters, Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein of the Washington Post, gambled their lives and careers to bring a nasty political conspiracy to light that eventually brought down President Nixon (as chronicled in the movie All the Presiden't Men).

Their dedication to uncovering the reality of what had happened at Watergate is something that seems to sorely lack in today's journalism. Take, for example, a look at the list of recent occurences in which the White House or another governmental agency has manipulated the media (openly, but mostly subtly):

- Feds warned about fake news videos: The White House Office of National Drug Control Policy was criticized last year for a series of video news releases in which a narrator, sometimes identified as "Karen Ryan" or "Mike Morris," said she or he was "reporting" on the office's activities. The tapes were sent to local television stations for use in news programs. The presentations "are intended to be indistinguishable from news segments broadcast to the public by independent television news organizations."

- The story on CBS' "60 Minutes" about the (supposedly) fake document relating to President Bush's Vietnam-era military service, resulting in "Rathergate" - the resignation of newscaster Dan Rather, and the rolling of 4 heads of the CBS news team. Why did all these people get axed? Not because they made a journalistic mistake - no. But rather because CBS was afraid to lose their Bush-friendly, right-wing clientele of advertisers. Instead of forfeiting millions in ad dollars, they decided to appease their clients by kicking out some journalists.

- The Jeff Gannon story. Alert readers will remember him as the White House "reporter" for Talon "News," who was unmasked for asking Bush only softball, partisan questions during press conferences. As it turns out now, he was one of Karl Rove's puppets. Who is Karl Rove? Bush's strategist, close friend and brain, of course.

- And last, but not least, the recent story of CNN chief Eason Jordan, who resigned his job after remarking at the World Economic Forum that U.S. forces in Iraq had deliberately targeted (and killed) some journalists. It was never discussed *why* he had made these comments (it's probably wrong to assume that he had a burning desire to get rid of his job - no?) - but if anybody would know about this, wouldn't it be somebody like him, the guy in charge of Iraq coverage for one of the nation's largest news networks? And if this indeed was reality, why would those forces have taken aim at journalists? To intimidate the rest into writing only favorable stories about the war?

We'll never know. The fact remains however that these days journalists don't report the truth anymore - they bow to the pressures of their networks, which in turn are being forced to their knees by either political or financial arm-twisting of the ruling class. And of course we all know that those are the people Bush considers his "base".

Luckily, the winds are changing. With the rise of technology, citizens who are tired and pissed-off at being fed bullshit news by a manipulated media, have taken up their arms and are starting to fire back. They are the bloggers.

Part 2 shall be posted tomorrow.



2/17/2005: The Sunriver Police Log Diaries

Time to wipe away that winter depression - and turn your glazed eyes to a tiny local newspaper for an uplifting bout of hilarity - the Sunriver Police Log, published in the monthly Sunriver Scene.

For any non-local readers, it first must be explained that the town of Sunriver is a "Private Planned Community" resort, roughly 18 miles south of Bend, Central Oregon, consisting mostly of part-time occupied vacation homes, nestled amongst tall trees and grouped around a maze of tightly wound streets and round-abouts where cars share the roadway with golf-carts (only during daylight hours though).

The town has its own administration, fire and police force, but in essence they are all privately-run. With all this comes a stringent set of rules - such as what color you may paint your house (anything outside of dull browns and greens is taboo), no parking your car, boat, golfcart or snowmobile anywhere but in strictly designated areas (least of all in front of your own house), and of course NO MAYHEM ANYWHERE - AT ALL.

This is all designed to keep the town a place that's eerily placid, clean-looking, runs at the golf-senior speed of 25 mph - and most of all is completely devoid of any possible fun, involving loud parties with lots of booze, spinning donuts in your golf-cart at 2am in your vacation rental's driveway, or similar such activities. To this must also be added however that the tiny Sunriver Liquor Store is the top-selling non-exclusive liqour store in the great State of Oregon.

So what you have here in essence is a tranquil vacation town where people (including a lot of college kids) come to from all over the U.S. to pursue honorable and clean-fun activities such as golfing, skiing, snowboarding, snowmobiling, hunting and fishing - and to get totally liquored up and go fucking crazy.

This is very much in contrast to the carefully crafted image of hushed carefreeness the Sunriver Owners Association would like to project. But what do they do to preserve their status? They publish (in much detail) a log of the month's police activites in the local newspaper, available for free at every gas station and store in town.

So without further ado, here are selected excerpts from the February issue of the "Sunriver Scene", chronicling December activities (and if you can't see the hilarious irony in this, you need to get your head adjusted):

12/4: Occupants of a vehicle threw empty beer bottle out onto main road and were given a choice to either clean up the mess they made or face a criminal citation. They chose to clean it up. Officers stood by as traffic control while this occured.

12/4: Stopped vehicle for defective lighting. Consent search of vehicle revealed two drug pipes and an open container. Both occupants were cited for Possession of Less Than An Ounce of Marijuana. Driver was also cited for an Open Container.

12/6: Received several phone calls throughout the evening about snowballs being thrown at passing vehicles. Several attempts to locate suspects were unsuccessful.

12/10: Report of a cold theft (prescription drugs taken) from a vehicle.

12/13: Criminal Mischief to an illuminated Christmas angel was reported by a homeowner.

12/19: Reporting party called to complain about snowmobile trailers in a driveway. The homeowner stated he would stop by the police department in the morning to find out what was being done about it.

12/25: Responded to a report of two juveniles shooting air guns. A verbal warning was issued and compliance was gained.

12/27: Responded to a report of a driver spinning "cookies" in a parking lot. Contact was made with the driver, who agreed to discontinue current actions.

12/30: Responded to a Theft of a picnic table from a home owner's property. The table was located across the common area, in the backyard of a rental home. Three juveniles were contacted who admitted using the table as a snowboard ramp. They returned the table to the owner with an apology.

12/31: Received a complaint about noise and vehicles driving badly in the area. When officers arrived, there were several vehicles parked on the roadway. We made contact with the renters of the house and advised them of the regulations. Officers required they use sober drivers to move the vehicles.

12/31: Responded to a report of a verbal dispute between a male and two females who had given the male a ride home. The vehicle got stuck in the snow while backing out of the driveway. The females were upset because the male wouldn't help them. The disagreement escalated when the male began throwing snowballs at the females. It was determined that there was no crime, and a tow truck was contacted.

... and these are just excerpts. The list goes on and on. I'm already looking forward to next month's edition. Can't wait to read all the good stuff that happened January 1st.

PS: Thanks to Jake for the tip.



February 15, 2005

My recent tendency of just posting rants about one thing or another got even too boring for me, so in order to get some fresh stuff up here, I'm posting some interesting links that have accumulated over time:

Bendites - ever wonder what the new expansion of the St. Charles Medical Center is going to look like? Thanks to a local company called Log Rhytms, you now can. These guys do kick-ass 3-D animations and have posted a very cool fly-around animation on their site. It's a large file, so the download may take a few minutes, but if you're on anything but dial-up, it's well worth the wait. As Log Rhytms specializes in 3-D animation of log homes though, this fly-around of a thatched-roof log house in Russia is also pretty fun to see.

People keep sending me cool photo-related links, so I've posted those over at my other blog.

I can't remember if I've ever posted this link, but it's equally genius (by the Burger King marketing people) as it is sick: the Subservient Chicken.

And although I'm running danger of incessantly (and unnecessarily) blanketing the internet with useless links, GIGOOZLE is just a little bit too much fun not to mention. Don't try to Gigoozle this site however - for some mysterious reason, it's not working on my site (maybe cause I'm running Zope?).



February 2, 2005

With the news of a yet another freaking Walmart being built in Bend comes the inevitable question one has to pose to one-self: Is it really worth saving those couple of bucks, and supporting the Evil Empire of retail? Or should one rather shell out the dough, knowing that one can sleep at night with a sound conscience?

While I can't say that I've never shopped at Walmart, this most interesting article in the Seattle Times shows that you don't have to pay minimum wage and treat your employees like crap in order be a successful big box store.

Quote: Economists will tell you there are at least two reliable, legal ways to make money in America.

One is to fleece the workers, taking not only their wool but their skin. A proven model resulting, the Economic Policy Institute in Washington, D.C., tells us, in CEOs earning in a day and a half what took their beleaguered flock a year to earn in 2003.

Or, there's the Henry Ford model: Pay people well enough that they stick around, cutting both turnover and training costs while boosting efficiency. Better yet, pay them well enough so they can even go out and buy something.

Amen to that!

Very few (too few!) companies indeed are seeing the logic of this reasoning. I used to work for one, before they also turned the corner a few years ago and adapted the Economy of Greed, paying their executives huge salaries, while telling the rest of the employees that raises just weren't an option. During layoffs, they would even reward the execs with bonuses - for having to deal with the stress of this difficult time...

The article continues to cite an example of how to do it right:

And Costco? Its overhead costs were lower, its volume of sales per employee higher, and its total sales bigger in 2003 than its arch rival, Sam's Club, a subsidiary of Wal-Mart.

Yet, Costco's health plan covers a larger percentage of employees than Wal-Mart's does, and workers pay less for it. Costco, in fact, provides among the best wage-and-benefit packages in hourly retail. And it pays the same wage scale everywhere in the country.

A cashier at Costco can make more than $40,000 annually within four years. The average store manager makes $107,000, with a crack at $40,000 in performance bonuses on top. The company also pays hourly workers annual bonuses from $4,000 to $7,000.

No wonder they stick around: Turnover at Costco is less than a third the industry average.

So my question is: Why can't Walmart adopt similar policies? Maybe I will pose this question at the public meeting Walmart is supposed to hold next week ...